JOS

 

Journey of a Sale: Strategic Research Transforming Sales Enablement

Project Timeline: 2025
Sr. UX Designer | Research Lead & Strategic Partner
Strategic Research Study


My Role

Led comprehensive strategic research initiative to map the complete Premium sales journey. Designed multi-phase research approach, facilitated discovery across diverse stakeholder groups, synthesized complex findings into actionable framework, and delivered prioritized recommendations that aligned competing interests and enabled evidence-based investment decisions.

Business Challenge

Indeed's sales leadership needed to understand how 2,000+ reps were selling Premium products before investing in new tools or processes. Without visibility into the actual end-to-end journey, they risked building solutions that didn't address real needs—wasting resources and missing revenue opportunities.

Impact At-A-Glance

Built stakeholder alignment across GTM Strategy, Sales Operations, Revenue Transformation, and Product
Translated fragmented feedback from 80+ participants into unified strategic framework
Delivered tiered recommendations enabling immediate action while defining long-term vision
Positioned UX as strategic partner in sales enablement, not just feature designers
Established reusable methodology adopted for future product research initiatives


Strategic Challenge

Stakeholders request: "Help us understand the sales journey for Premium so we know where to invest”

The Real Challenge: Competing Priorities Without Shared Understanding

Different stakeholders had conflicting views on what needed fixing:

  • Sales Operations wanted better lead identification

  • GTM Strategy wanted streamlined processes

  • Product Teams wanted to know which tools to improve

  • Sales Reps wanted less manual work

Without understanding the complete journey, each team would optimize their piece independently—potentially making the overall system worse.

What I Discovered:

Through structured discovery, I uncovered 6 interconnected challenges that no single team could solve alone:

  • Tool fragmentation forcing manual work (7+ tools for one call)

  • Missing data preventing ROI justification

  • Product confusion from overlapping offerings

  • Ineffective lead identification

  • Pitch materials not supporting visual selling

  • Internal complexity from legacy processes

Strategic Reframe

Rather than collecting feature requests, I needed to:

  1. Document reality vs. prescribed process - What reps actually do, not what they're supposed to do

  2. Identify systemic patterns - Root causes, not symptoms

  3. Find leverage points - Where small changes create big impact

  4. Build stakeholder alignment - Common understanding enabling coordinated action

This positioned the research to inform strategy, not just validate features.

The Core Insight I Surfaced:

"The main challenge isn't the lack of resources. It is the lack of seamlessly connected plug-and-play resources."

This reframing shifted the conversation from "which tool should we fix?" to "how do we create a connected system?"

Current State: What Sales Reps Actually Do

Desired State: What Business Needs

The Strategic Bet

Success required aligning systems with how reps should spend time, not just automating current dysfunction. Without addressing this fundamental misalignment, new features would only perpetuate inefficiency.

The Reality

The real problem wasn't tool limitations—it was lack of alignment between business needs, user workflows, and system design across multiple business units. Reps spent 95% of their time on non-revenue activities while business goals required 90% client-facing work.


Process

Our team spent 13 weeks conducting comprehensive discovery with 80+ participants across Sales, Client Success, Sales Operations, and Sales Effectiveness teams. We mapped out a broad Jobs To Be Done framework for each segment and dove deeper into particularly problematic workflows.

Through 85+ discovery sessions and 20 executive interviews, we identified 5 systemic challenges preventing reps from spending meaningful time with clients. We synthesized findings into 54 Epics, 95 Capabilities, and 450+ User Stories that aligned stakeholder priorities with user needs.

Finally, we co-designed future state experiences with sales and CS reps, prototyped concepts for the highest-impact workflows, and validated 33 wireframes through iterative usability testing with end-users across multiple business units.

Activities

  • Interviews and User Journey Mapping
    85+ sessions | 80+ participants

  • Jobs To Be Done Framework
    core jobs and tasks defined for Sales, Client Success and Sales Operations

  • Research Synthesis & Insights
    Analyzed qualitative and quantitative data to identify patterns, created collective sentiments, and documented 5 systemic challenges

  • Co-Design &Alignment Workshops
    Facilitated collaborative sessions with business stakeholders and technical teams to align on future state vision and priorities

  • Wireframing and Prototyping
    33 Wireframes validated

  • Iterative usability testing
    Multiple validation rounds


UX Research - 5 Critical Challenges

Example of existing account page

1. Broken foundation = poor UX
Constrained processes, fragmented data, poor rep experience

2. Workarounds eclipse impact
Teams created manual workflows instead of fixing root systems

3. Disconnected systems overwhelm
Swivel chair, manual tasks prevent client-facing time

4. Playing detective wastes time
Reps dig through systems for basic client data instead of selling

5. Tools don't help with strategy
Systems store data but don't provide actionable insights


Example of comprehensive Jobs To Be Done artifact which serves as a foundational piece of our UX research.


Example demonstrating design iteration


Design Solutions

Four strategic transformations that turned dysfunction into efficiency

Role-Based Views Over One-Size-Fits-All

  • Before: Every user saw the same information regardless of their role, forcing Sales, Client Success, and Sales Ops to manually filter irrelevant data

  • After: Tailored information architecture and data to reflect the specific needs of each user type—Sales sees pipeline, CS sees health metrics, Ops sees forecasts

  • Impact: Each team sees exactly what they need to do their job, eliminating time spent filtering and increasing data relevance

Essential Information Over Visual Clutter

  • Before: Account screens overwhelmed users with every possible data point, making it impossible to quickly understand client status or identify next actions

  • After: Redesigned screens to surface only the most critical information reps need to understand their clients—removing visual clutter and cognitive load

  • Impact: Reps can now scan accounts in seconds instead of minutes, focusing on client relationships instead of hunting through data

Reps can now scan accounts in seconds instead of minutes, focusing on client relationships instead of hunting through data

Single System Over Tool Fragmentation

  • Before: Reps swiveled between 5+ disconnected systems, manually copying data between external spreadsheets, internal tools, and Salesforce

  • After: Consolidated multiple systems into a single unified Salesforce instance, eliminating tool fatigue and creating one source of truth

  • Impact: Reduced context switching and manual data synchronization, freeing reps to focus on client-facing activities

Actionable Insights Over Data Storage

  • Before: Systems functioned as passive data repositories—storing information but providing no strategic guidance on what to do next

  • After: Transformed systems to surface actionable insights—next best actions, forecasting recommendations, and proactive alerts that drive strategy

  • Impact: Tools now augment human intelligence instead of just recording history, enabling data-driven decisions at every touchpoint


Results

What This Research Enabled

Aligned competing stakeholders around shared understanding of current state
Shifted investment strategy from tool improvements to system integration
Enabled evidence-based decisions replacing assumptions with user data
Created reusable framework adopted for Enterprise segment research (Phase 2)
Positioned UX strategically as research partner, not just feature designers